I actually usually like the scratchers but after 185 cards, and not getting a single SEC, kinda thinking it's not worth doing it in the future.

I have just uploaded version 3.03d of the Playlist Generator. I've fixed 3 programming error all relating to clip filters and tags. I've also added a new tag "Tran all types" which should make it easier to exclude transition clips. I also changed the clip hotness count logic. Transition clips are no longer counted.

It can be found at: https://virtuastripper.net/files/Playlist_Generator.zip

If you have customized your current version, be sure to export your tags and filters before moving to the new version. See the User Notes for details, or ask me here.

Important note: The clip tags "tran ctl ..." are descriptors of regular clips not transition clips. They describe which transition clips may follow a regular clip. If you exclude these tags you will likely exclude many regular clips from your search. These tags have limited value.

One week of customer screwing. My fingers would rot off before I gave it another shot. They can stick that thing anywhere.

Finally I Got it! LOL!

OK so I gave it one last go, 4:20 PDT and 4:20 PST an hour later, No luck, will wait for the team to update accounts now.

I have one suggestion for future achievements, an expansion of the critic award. You could do several more like "serious critic" - write a review for 10 cards you own, "honorary Critic" - write a review for 30 cards you own. Maybe even "Psychic Critic" - write a review for a card you do NOT own. I think you get some fun out these kinds of achievements.I would not support this. People would then tend to write totally casual and unuseful reviews only reason and purpose of which would be helping them to get the badge...

I agree @HansSachs - while I am qt home self-isolating I have been working my way through my unwatched cards and I have been posting what I hope are useful reviews.In doing so, I am seeing more and more so called reviews that are simply one word - and as reviews they are neither use nor ornament. If people can do this simply to win a badge it cheapens the achievement and makes it harder for people to be able to assess if a card has what they want before they buy.

As for reviewing a card you do not own - what on earth would be the point of that?

I have one suggestion for future achievements, an expansion of the critic award. You could do several more like "serious critic" - write a review for 10 cards you own, "honorary Critic" - write a review for 30 cards you own. Maybe even "Psychic Critic" - write a review for a card you do NOT own. I think you get some fun out these kinds of achievements.I would not support this. People would then tend to write totally casual and unuseful reviews only reason and purpose of which would be helping them to get the badge...

What is surprising is that more review systems don't put more criteria to what you see.

Example anyone could write a review but as a purchaser I should be able to filter to only see reviews of owners, people who watched for 10hrs, ect.

I could also rate the reviewer and the ones I agree with show up and the ones I disagree don't show up in my rating.

This doesn't exist anywhere so not saying it's a shortcoming here.

I have one suggestion for future achievements, an expansion of the critic award. You could do several more like "serious critic" - write a review for 10 cards you own, "honorary Critic" - write a review for 30 cards you own. Maybe even "Psychic Critic" - write a review for a card you do NOT own. I think you get some fun out these kinds of achievements.

I would not support this. People would then tend to write totally casual and unuseful reviews only reason and purpose of which would be helping them to get the badge...

I have one suggestion for future achievements, an expansion of the critic award. You could do several more like "serious critic" - write a review for 10 cards you own, "honorary Critic" - write a review for 30 cards you own. Maybe even "Psychic Critic" - write a review for a card you do NOT own. I think you get some fun out these kinds of achievements.

Thank You for the enlightenment !!!
I'm one of those people who have adverse reactions to substances others find recreational.
*****gives me a sickening dizzy headache.
***** makes every muscle cell feel ill to the point of wanting to throw up.
Thankfully, ***** does relax muscles but the cheap stuff can give me a bad hangover so I'm not in danger of being an alcoholic because my body punishes me if I overdo it.
I prefer good bourbon or a nice single malt scotch.

Thanks

For those who have not received their badge yet drink 3 shots of JD old #7,
3 cans Coors light and smoke 3 joints twice a day until you receive it. Works
great for me.😇

I think we're all still waiting for the team to run the scans that will identify the winnersI don't know about others, but personally I am waiting them to do things as fixing Search function on forum, or the defective cards.

I think we have to be patient and let Celine and the team sort it out. They are working in difficult circumstances with working from home and they have a buggy beta version 1.2.248 to fix plus the faults as mentioned by @HansSachs.

So - we don't know their internal priorities but I'm willing to cut them some slack if they can at least keep us informed.

my xoxo achievemnt is also missing i won the fan sign of carly rae -.-

"4:20 Louis"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/420_(cannabis_culture)
😎

Oh @TimDenchanter - where have you been? 😄

The 4:20 references are all about cannabis. I will quote from Wikipedia....

"4/20 (pronounced four-twenty) is *****culture slang for ***** consumption, especially smoking around the time 4:20 pm, and also refers to cannabis-oriented celebrations that take place annually on April 20 (which is 4/20 in U.S. form)."

Hence the background in the badge is a *****leaf and Carolina Abril is used as "Abril" is Spanish for April.

I knew none of this until this badge appeared.

originally, 4 20 was the time of day.
school ended at 3:00
detention ended at 4:00
twenty minutes to get to the meeting place to.... get started...

I followed Celines instructions about contacting her concerning winning a fan sign and have still not received that badge

I think we're all still waiting for the team to run the scans that will identify the winners

I don't know about others, but personally I am waiting them to do things as fixing Search function on forum, or the defective cards.

I followed Celine's instructions and have not recieved the 4:20 badge. What's up?

I think we're all still waiting for the team to run the scans that will identify the winners and award us accordingly.

It is taking time.

Oh @TimDenchanter - where have you been? 😄

The 4:20 references are all about cannabis. I will quote from Wikipedia....

"4/20 (pronounced four-twenty) is *****culture slang for ***** consumption, especially smoking around the time 4:20 pm, and also refers to cannabis-oriented celebrations that take place annually on April 20 (which is 4/20 in U.S. form)."

Hence the background in the badge is a *****leaf and Carolina Abril is used as "Abril" is Spanish for April.

I knew none of this until this badge appeared.

They likely stopped to promote urgency when they do release a pack.

I will say I think like someone else said the only reason to get scratch cards is if you are new like I am or if you want the SEC.

Its not a great deal but its okay for people with zero discounts on their profile. That deal is outweighted by getting random cards.

I think possibly a better option would be a hidden booster pack with a theme in which a SEC could be randomly won. Possibly it could be that if you get a duplicate card it refunds you that portion of the booster as well.

You could just "scratch" to reveal each of the cards instead? Or possibly have it where you purchsae between 1-10 cards and there are 12 of them on the page and you the cards are numbered 1-12 you getting from 1 up to the number you purchased?

Lots of ways to possibly remove some of the complete randomness, keep some of the profit that they want, and get more out of it in the end for normal people.

I followed Celine's instructions and have not recieved the 4:20 badge. What's up?

Understand the "May the 4th" Star Wars reference but not the 4:20 thing ... please enlighten me THX

7 hours ago (edited)Little Caprice, Sybil, Cherry Kiss, Alyssa Reese have all become major starlets in@orclover - I was reading my way through your post when my eyes spotted two words - Belka and webcam!Please tell me more.....She goes by Faneti Reni.

Thanks @orclover - found it - including a nearly 2 hour cam video - wowser 😊😆

Hahahaha, they should have made buy 500 credits at 4.20 Badge, that would be a nice thing as well.

I think they could even give the 4:20 badge as a prize in Scratch Cards or in Slot Machine... it looks like people would be ready to bet tons of credits just in order to get it. 😲

7 hours ago (edited)
Little Caprice, Sybil, Cherry Kiss, Alyssa Reese have all become major starlets in
@orclover - I was reading my way through your post when my eyes spotted two words - Belka and webcam!

Please tell me more.....

She goes by Faneti Reni.

I pulled "play time min".

Play Time min is a card attribute and should be pretty accurate. The staticProperties file contains the total number of frames in all the .vghd clips of a card. That number does not inlcude .demo clips or transition clips. I assume 25 frames per second and use that to calculate the play time. I understand that some cards are recorded at 24 frames per second, so there is the potential for a 4% error. At one time I thought some cards were recorded at 20 frames per second, but that doesn't seem to be true.

The uncertainty is about the Play Time sec in the Clip table. That is an approximation. The staticProperties file contains the size of the card for all available resolutions. From what I can see this is the total number of bytes for the same set of .vghd clips that are used for counting the number of frames. Using the correct resolution for your collection, I calculate average bytes per second for the card. Then I use the actual size of each clip to calculate the play time of that clip. This results in a set of numbers that add up correctly but will be off by the amount that the average bits/second of a clip differs from the overall average for the card. I'm not an expert on video encoded, but I would think that a card with a lot of motion would require more bits/sec than one with less. I do know that when I compare the result of my estimates with the published play time of clips there are significant differences. One advantage of my approach is that it lets me estimate the play time of transition clips.

If I knew a way to capture Totem's numbers, I'd use them, but I don't.

May be it would be great to have more permanent booster packs (even if you cannot choose the cards in the packs) with various thematics to define.

Back when the program was called VirtuaGirlHD Totem permanently offered quite an extensive range of themed booster packs. I do not know why they stopped, but presumably it was for good business reasons.

@gkar45,
Thank you. (no 4:20 achievement yet).

@arise77 I agree and many people are in your case since the poll for the May 22nd promo is clearly in favour of the Cashback offer.

May be it would be great to have more permanent booster packs (even if you cannot choose the cards in the packs) with various thematics to define.

Scratched 300+ cards and only 1 SEC out of 7 in the store. I mainly played because the SECs cannot be bought. While I still came out as a winner (gained some credits), I see no point inHmm, vO continuing with gambling games like these as the chance of winning SECs is extremely low and scratching cards is time consuming.

I alsno noticed the fact that today I did not win a single blank (or 20 credits), playing 200 cards. Saturday I won several of those, playing a 100 cards, It appears the rules and odds have been changed, which I also consider an incentive to skip the games at all and forget about SECs.

7 hours ago (edited)
Little Caprice, Sybil, Cherry Kiss, Alyssa Reese have all become major starlets in

@orclover - I was reading my way through your post when my eyes spotted two words - Belka and webcam!

Please tell me more.....

@Dfner I'm glad members who have a full collection can get SECs quite easily, after all you guys buy all the cards and should be rewarded in a sense for that.

@Gorfa91 I agree sometimes I got cards I wouldn't have bought and they ended up being surprisingly nice. But that only happened a few times.
I am already less picky than in the past, I started getting a larger variety of models when Totem added weekend discounts and -12% push previews a few years back. At that point I was willing to spend more to get more cards; I still had the choice of cards I was getting though.
These days, you have Booster packs one week, then Mystery envelopes the next, then gambling, then Lucky boxes, etc. All pre-selected cards.

I already ***** so many credits on the Scratch game and the Slot machine that I don't see the point anymore.

Gamblers already have their games twice a month, offer Booster packs or Mystery boxes to whover likes pre-selection. Why not give the opportunity to members like us to get Joker cards or SECs without all the stuff we don't want?

@Jenkers @thoooth let's talk with our wallets! 😉💰

As other members have suggested before, all members who are between new and maxed-out members are the ones paying for this promotion. If we stop taking part in this, Totem will have to improve this game to make it worth it for us.

4:20 with me also not what is wrong with it (1:20)

Wouldn't it be easier having the 4:20 achievement work like this?

Buy a card between 4:20 and 4:20:59 pm CEST -> you get it
Buy a card between 4:20 and 4:20:59 pm PDT -> You get it

Add options, that helps. The achievements themselves are a fun feature but need some tuning in terms of requirements.

Just wanting the "Well Done" achievement :)

les ***** angels contre le COVID 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

@Z22

The == operator is a comparison for equality that evalutes to 0 for not equal or to 1 for equal. It is not an assignment.

The statement dist == (distance(G, H)); is valid because the shader language's syntax is based on that of C which allows expressions anywhere that you would expect statements. In the example the function distance will be called, its return value compared with dist and the result discarded, in particular dist will not be updated by this statement and if distance has no side effects the whole statement can be optimised away because it has no visible effect.

In any sensible language such statements would be errors, but they are valid in C or GLSL.

The following is a valid, if rather pointless, function

void func(void)
{ 42;
}

It is also easy to make the opposite error and use = where you intend to ==, e.g.

if ( a == 0 ) do_something();

will compare a with 0 and only call do_something if a is equal to zero

but

if ( a = 0 ) do_something();

will set a to the value 0 and will never call do_something() whereas

if ( a = 1 ) do_something();

will set a to 1 and will always call do_something()

@Dragontaylor I don't have any of the XXX shows of Belle currently downloaded, but if I do before the 22nd I'll let you know.

Also, Carly Rae in Relentless (the BDSM themed one) provides a pretty good dirty talk show.

Noticed something weird

if i have

dist == (distance(G, H));

rather than

dist = (distance(G, H));

i get a different result.

Anyony know whats going on with that?

@Tommy7358

Ah, I meant by why does gkar45 think that Scratch Games are good in terms of efficiency.

When you are only interested in efficiency then don't do the Scratch Games or the Slot Machines.
@lukaszr has given you already some very helpful Tips, at least in my Opinion.
And @gkar45 also mentioned the Cashback Bonus.

OT
But sometimes you can't always be efficient, for example yesterday i bought another 250 Credits Pack.
Because i wanted to have finally the full Set of Li Moon, and i really really couldn't resist of
Martina Smeraldi, Tina, Stefania Beatty and Sasha Meow .... Oh WOW 😍
OT/

So you see efficiency is not always the best way, sometimes you have to make yourself Happy 😊

@Alkasyn, Belle Claire was brought up but appreciate the confirmation. Does she dirty talk in all her shows then? I can confirm in general that some models only dirty talk in some shows unfortunately, not all their XXX shows. So confirmation which shows models dirty talk in is further narrowing it down, which would be quite helpful.

@Stanston, True enough. Still, as I’ve read some others bring up, istripper is primarily a different service focused on teasing. JOI, dirty talk is a specific variety of teasing which has grown in popularity exponentially. Frankly it’s still a challenge to find good dirty talk teasing from appreciable models, and istripper could help corner the market there. Professional productions don’t seem to have caught on, more so cam girls/self productions are meeting that need of viewers.

I hope we’ll get a capability to access the program on tablets at some point. This is primarily a video production, so a mobile version for the clips not necessarily the whole app should be possible. I for one just get a vein in my forehead in frustration always dealing with a computer over simply opening my tablet. (Not to mention that I have a 4K screen and still need to tinker to get 1080p that’s not blurry)

@pickle1, yeah. I looked through as much as I could searching based on English countries, categories and available tags to narrow it down, and frankly searched randomly to narrow down what I did. There might be some more out there, hopefully, but other than searching every card I’m stumped at how to find them with dirty talk in the shows. As I posted above with the quotes, it’s still not an exact science, but comments people made on each card/show identifying dirty talk in their review is pretty much the only way to know if that’s available in a show until they give us a tag for it. Or just get every show and ***** a coin on it. :(

@Duras, Danielle maybe was mentioned more than once mate, Unfortunately I think her dirty talk is restricted to her solo Xxx show which I can’t access just yet. Got her red tulip XXX show and no sound. :(

@hooded thanks for the card number, helps narrow it down. Yeah think that’s the solo I mentioned before, thanks for the confirmation. She does more basic talk then, not really detailed scenario or anything? A comment on her show said it was like she was talking to the viewer, I had hoped that was good.

@pickle1. Breaking the rules? Blasphemy good sir. As long as there’s dirty talk. From there we narrow down by language, and quality. Better quality is appreciated, but they’d have to really be trying to do it poorly for dirty talk to be a negative.

Thanks for the addition, I’ll plan to get it at the next cash back Friday on the 22nd. Apparently it’s one of those I can’t access at this level of cards owned. Should be better once I’m gold, but I ***** I won’t be able to access until platinum based on membership level description.
I had planned to be gold already and would get it now, but had some issues around the 1sts TGIF cashback event. 2 of my shows were double bought, and I lost out on the value for cashback the first attempt. Fortunately, now that I’ve identified the shows to get in better detail than my rough guessing then, I’ll be ready for the 22nd.

Anyway thanks for the suggestion pickle, the show comments agree on the dirty talk present, and as you said it’s interactive in good easy to understand English I look forward to seeing it.

Please keep posting suggestions gents, until a tag is present identifying shows with dirty talk, we’ll just have to do it ourselves 😎

Hahahaha, they should have made buy 500 credits at 4.20 Badge, that would be a nice thing as well.

89 scratches and nothing even close to what I would ever buy :( Never again.

Are you going to be donating the revenue (or a portion therof) to nurses?

@Dfner, what were they expecting? They released a set of pretty pictures to a bunch of adicts that will pay thousands to get 1 card (sec), and seemingly from the complaints have poorly implimented some of the rules to gain them.
Personally i think it's good the tab finally has something in there but i'm not going to stress over getting a sticker.

Little Caprice, Sybil, Cherry Kiss, Alyssa Reese have all become major starlets in europe and do not have any 4k shows. I get it is hard to catch the American girls during their weekend in Europe but I can't fathom how totem can skip on the stars of europe. Rex's main excuses have been that the girls won't shoot for totem unless they are new or old but we all know money talks. No girl is turning down a shoot if the price is right. I am becoming increasingly frustrated with the ***** practices of games of chance, SE cards, achievements, even VR while totem fails to get the best active talents in europe, it is like they are using the old recruiting practices while raking in money from these other sources. It has gotten to the point where I don't necessarily look forward to the girls anymore...even girls like Jia Lissa are putting on tired and scripted shows...so much so that the older cards from a few years ago seem light years ahead.

One way to tell that the girls are boring and the community isn't digging it is to look through the forum and see how few of the threads are about the girls. Nearly every comment is about gambling or achievements when we should be talking about awesome, talented girls dancing. I mean we had two Belka xxx cards released and they were as uninspiring as one could imagine...like I literally couldn't imagine them being boring, having seen her webcam and somehow they were...and nearly every card falls in the same boat...so it much a combination of misdirection, inexperience, and lack of performance talent.


The great thing about hope is they can make me wrong in a month by putting forth a great group of shows...this has been a rough start to 2020.

Nevermind I was able to create a new query to get what I wanted. I pulled "play time min".

That is the area though you are saying is inaccurate? I might play around with it. In the end if its not possible its not possible can only work with the data given.