Age Verification
This website contains age-restricted material including nudity and explicit content. By entering, you confirm being at least 18 years old or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from.
I am 18+ or older - Enter
I am under 18 - Exit
Our parental controls page explains how you can easily block access to this site.

Letzte Beiträge - Seite 658

  Forum

orclover
Mitglied seit in Jun 2012
1402 Beiträge

Looking for a overall opinion on something..

Alles über iStripper
17. October 2020, 25 antworten
Hi everyone was looking for yor overall opinion on something...
A few years ago a young beauty by the name of Kristy Black came along and started a trend that I have come to love..the topless rated panty preview flash. This was awesome when I first saw it and over time occasionally would happen during the shows. Panty flashes, upskirt flashes w/o panties, panties that were so small or transparent that you could see a little kitty as they moved around..all labeled just topless. A model named ria rodrigues actually has one of the best topless clips ever turning around and twerking in underwear that just could not contain her..
Nowadays those things still happen but they're always now rated nudity and Imho I think it takes away from the teasing aspect that those same clips would have if labeled the other way.If it's nudity you know to expect nudity..if it's topless it kind of has that oops i just teased whats coming type of effect..makes running in safe mode just a little bit more special if/when you have to..I'm starting to ramble so I'll just ask do other people think that Totem editors should let just a little more slide when deciding topless to nudity ratings on these clips? I can't be the only one that likes these kind of teases am I? Or is this just a stupid fetish that I alone have and should not bother bringing up again here or when I ***** in the comments sections. Let me know what you think and everyone stay safe.

I think there has to be a level of forgiveness with ratings. Either a totem employee has to watch 5-7 hours of finished content a week, intently enough to pick out nudity vs. topless, or a non-totem employee has to do the same for free. Nearly evMany cards have mistakes...I don't think it is wise to look too deeply into the tags.
Apasas
Mitglied seit in Aug 2009
1975 Beiträge

Looking for a overall opinion on something..

Alles über iStripper
17. October 2020, 25 antworten
I sympathise with the OPs suggestion because Totem can be inconsistent with the ratings.

There are some non-nudity clips when you may glimpse a bare nipple or bare pussy. But I am more concerned with clothed clips.

Take one of my favoured cards: Army Fan from Andie. In this card, Andie wears a slightly transparent t-shirts through which you can make out her nipples. All clips in this card are rated topless or higher. I would much prefer that the clips in that card were rated non-nudity when Andie keeps her top on.

Compare this to another favourite card of mine: Good Catch by Jana H. In this card, Jana wears a webbed top which is much more revealing than Andie's Army Fan card. Yet, where Jana keeps her top on, it is rated as non-nudity.

Now, I am a person who likes to play non-nudity clips. It always irks me that Andie's card will not be included in the playlist, while a much more revealing g card from Jana is included.

I am not ***** of the classification of Jana's card. But I am unhappy with the classification of Andie's card. Her card is the most obvious one for me. But there are others I would change, if I had the opportunity.

My view is that we should have complete freedom in how we classify the clips in our own collection. Those who don't want to change, don't need to. Those who want to change can.

The only thing that is required would be a 'reset to default button' in case we want to return to the default setting.