Age Verification
This website contains age-restricted material including nudity and explicit content. By entering, you confirm being at least 18 years old or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from.
I am 18+ or older - Enter
I am under 18 - Exit
Our parental controls page explains how you can easily block access to this site.

Letzte Beiträge - Seite 252

  Forum

dar2112v
Mitglied seit in Dec 2007
920 Beiträge

Are Non-Cryptocurrency Users Being Punished with the 20% Reload?

Alles über iStripper
21. March 2023, 9 antworten
Every currency is new and great until the whales think they have made enough money out of it and withdraw there massive shares and the common man is left holding a bag of nothing. Maybe even less than nothing.


if the Price Per Dolz dropped since you Aquired them, then you take a loss from the differance.

In simple this is called the 'Greater Fool Theory'. Meaning you buy something with no real value with the assumption you'll sell it to someone else at an even higher price. I've done it and it's worked out at times and then at other times I've also been left 'holding the bag'.

I definitely don't want to be the guy holding the bag in the porn crypto world but if you have a wallet and crypto you don't know what to do with then buying credits with crypto seems safe enough from a cost perspective. The price of credits is pegged to the dollar not Dolz as far as I understand (and I'm not sure that I do understand). Just don't hold on to Dolz if you are worried about losing money.

I'm more on the coming out with 'less than nothing'. I own crypto like a commodity (greater fool) but using a wallet is too near the seedy side of it. I want no part of the world where crypto is used transactionally. Today someone was telling me how they used crypto on Tor network to buy ***** while they were in high school. To each their own, I just hope I'm smart enough to sell my crypto before it's worth less than a tulip or pets.com :)

Wyldanimal
MODERATOR
Mitglied seit in Mar 2008
17180 Beiträge
Demilian25
Mitglied seit in Sep 2012
3 Beiträge
JonC001
Mitglied seit in Mar 2008
6796 Beiträge
TheEmu
Mitglied seit in Jul 2012
7424 Beiträge

More space for dancers in a scene

Alles über iStripper
20. March 2023, 3 antworten
@ezromeo

If @mkst is correct in thinking that you are talking about the girls bunching up in the small size multi-girl desktop mode rather than in the scene mode then the reason for this is the way in which iStripper spreads the clips across the width of the screen. The following is an approximation to how it is done. For simplicity I will restrict myself to the case where there are only simple standing clips including pole dance clips.

Firstly, although each clip looks to be quite narrow they are, when played at 100% size, effectively approximately the same size and shape as your screen and during their performance the girls are free to wander all over this area.

When the small size multi-girl desktop mode is used the program, by default, will position smaller versions of these screen shaped areas evenly spaced across the screen but in such a way that they are all fully on the screen.

If you have configured to play only a small number of clips simultaneously or if the size you have specified for those clips is low then the program can position them such that they do not overlap. But if too many clips are to be displayed or a large size has been specified then the areas used for each clip will overlap and the distance between their centres will be reduced in order to keep them all completely on the screen. It is this that cause the bunching effect that you see (and that many of us, myself included, dislike).

Think what would happen if multiple clips were all displayed at 1005 size. They would all be the same size as the screen and in order for any of them to fully fit on the screen they would have to be displayed at the same place.

I am sure that the above is wrong in detail as the program seems to reposition clips only when something "untoward" happens (such as a girl walking off the edge of the screen) rather than simply using pre-calculated positions but the end result is much the same.

The solution is simple - go to the setting page and reduce the number of clips to be played, or their size or both.

Note, the program keeps track of where card centres have been have repositioned and will continue to use these memorised positions until you reset them. You can do this by ***** the each girl to a new position until you are satisfied (remember to ***** them slightly up the screen so that they drop down to the task bar or bottom of the screen rather than dropping off the bottom). A quicker way to reset the positions may be to exit the program 9using the Quit menu entry, closing the window does not quit the program), delete the file holding them (I think this is called entrances.dat) and restarting iStripper.
orclover
Mitglied seit in Jun 2012
1403 Beiträge

Survey time!

Alles über iStripper
20. March 2023, 121 antworten
I think Totem is correctly concentrating on making the new version easy to use and attractive for new users. If they react the way *I* did to my first experience with the product- I bought credits FIVE times the first DAY, and they were mostly the 500 blocks- getting new users sucked in is waaaaay more profitable than making fancy changes for the experienced users that already have pretty much all the existing cards they want. And who have gotten the existing version to pretty much do what they want.

Of course, there are a lot more of us so it looks like we will get some goodies too. 😀

It was great to see the survey anyway.

Istripper was in bad shape by 2013 when it was dying as vghd and what saved them was improving the talent, show scripting, and outfits dramatically by 2015, and maybe some luck having girls like Viola, Lucy Li, Nekane willing to shoot for istripper just as it was rebranding. People will flock to the product as long as it offers something people can't get for free and it is still the sole provider of naked girls dancing in a classy and consistent format. This is why I left the b/g and machine options blank as I really didn't want istripper to focus away from getting the best dancers or making the best dancers. I think this is why duo shows, group shows, and all xxx shows fail. We can get those all over the web, what we can't get it full body view dancing. And it is proven if people can't get erotica they want they will try to pirate it, and istripper is resilient to pirating and therefore people must buy it.
stefnev1
MODERATOR
Mitglied seit in Jul 2008
17179 Beiträge