Feet mean sex for me. They are so obvious during sexual intercourse, on my shoulders, on my face or both sides of my face. Feet are an integral part of a beauty, part of her style. When a woman takes off her shoes, I may hear a promise. Even during pole dancing feet up feet out are exciting. On the other hand, when it becomes unnatural like asking a model to suck her toes, it turns ridiculous. Yes for "all naked feet" cards but please keep them natural

I think it would be best to have a varity amoung cards with respect to "stripping speed". This will keep things interesting and avoid a uniform experience where every card feels the same. The approach proposed by others to leave this up to the girls to some extends seems reasonable for me. If a girl does not feel too comfortable with pole dancing then she should start to strip off her clothes instead (or do something else) to keep the show interesting.

Nevertheless I voted in the poll "Get naked too quick".
I feel that some of the recent cards could be improved by additional layers of clothing. For example: Sapphira - #0183 and Katya Clover - #0221 start out with rather conservative outfits. In the show the girls get nude quite fast because they don't wear any bra. A sexy bra would look good on both girls, keep the show going for a longer time and postpone the final reward of full nudity.
For bikini and lingerie outfits I agree with szalka: applying accessories is the right way. Victoria Blaze - #1011 and Chelsea French - #0720 are some good examples where this has been done in the past.

depending on the outfit...like swimsuits for example but i must be honest to say i've been extremely dissapointed after bying shows where the models are wearing hot outfits ex: saphira a, camila chix, taylor sands, katya clover and more recently elen moore, just to find out they take the shoes off before theyre completely naked or like others have pointed out some clips even start with the model already barefooted...i love heels on women and seeing how fast they take them off ***** it for me and feel like i ***** my credits. i dont care about naked feet on over taskbar clips tho.
jc

Thx. @Apasas
all very good and job

Britney Classic

Depends.
If the show's f.e. beach-, bedroom-, bathroom-, next door girl- or ***** theme - are very good the barefoot scenes, but if the show's boss-, secretary-, cop-, military- or domina theme - are isn't allowed the barefoot scenes.

In my opinion in VG shows takes a girls need they have good movement and good dancers on the floor and on pole, if they not good dancers them must go in DB shows.

VG:
I agree: The diversity is the main thing in this theme.
Must be lot of dancing scene - a third part with clothed with upskirt and teasing, a third part with lingerie or topless and last third part in nude clips. It's important that the strip-tease to be slow and sensual.
If in the show the model wearing only one-peices swimsuite or bikini or bra-panties lingerie - here must be applying the accessories - f.e.: if tehy wearing swimsuite or bikini: bathrobe, towels, magazines, MP4 player, bike, if they wearing only lingerie: stockings, tights, book, chair and tables, etc., the models using their make-up kit, doing everyday little thing beside teasing and strip-tease.
Let more role play show with special clothes, the girls can used wig too.
The show could fall or winter theme with raincoat, umbrella, winter jacket, ski boot, etc. - but in the end good sexy strip-tease because it is the essence of things.
Previously made similar clips - but these earlier shows were too soft with minimal nudity and eroticism.

It's very important the clips don't be monotone and boring.

DB:
Please the 1nd-2nd (maybe 3rd too) clips are standing clips with her seductive dresses and here the girls make a good sexy and teasing strip-tease. Then can coming sitting clips with masturbating and sex.
Here also the diversity is the main thing.
Clothes, role play, several sex toys, etc. - and another important thing: This shows are sound and disturbing noise of the platform shoes in action, better if the girls are barefoot after stripping.

It's very important these clips also don't be monotone and boring.

I don't care much if a few close shots feature naked feet.
Standing / dancing / pole clips are usually better with model wearing shoes.

Nikky Case explains VGHD office policy...

*lool* Now I am *****. Do you guys mean fully nude, only wearing high heels are very appreciated? If so then I agree cause I think that's very sexy too! But for example poledance clips without shoes are imho redundant.

I agree with alex34780000: starting fully nude other than high heels in the standing and pole clips have imo something very sexy. Please keep these.

Thanks for asking/listening Rex!

I agree with Apasas & Maverick302.

Also, if you do clips that start out naked, best to NOT use standing or pole clips but use the sitting on taskbar or taskbar over clips.

@alex34780000, I think you mean 'fully nude other than high heels''.
..little wonder people get ***** on this forum. lol.

Well, seems everything that has relevance has been said.
Don't want it to become a flaming war.

Done

LOL, 91thebasu, I'm taking that as a hint - and will make said request.

Seriously, I love the Totem product, and I ***** that this problem has arisen.

Let it close.​

If the OP wishes for his thread to be closed so that he can just talk to a Team member through customer service or PM's, I can do that for you.

I'd be more than happy to defer to any Tolstoy wannabe, who has not only a law degree, but, also, a specific law degree in international business and international incorporation.

To the best of my knowledge, a self-professed "government" paid computer nerd does not fit the equation.

Now, I've ***** enough time reading nothing but a bunch of tripe​​ - as such, this is my last post on a thread that has morphed into the irrelevant diatribe and speculation of an uninformed member of this site.

For the record, I DO have a law degree, and have had one since the early '80s - but I'm not in the mood to make a fool of myself, by professing to ***** up a bunch of crap that I know absolutely NOTHING about - to wit - international law, and international corporate structure​, with an emphasis on the Homeland Security Act.

I'm sure that the puking will continue - along with the irrelevant vitriol directed at a simple post, which was meant to apprise Totem of a financial problem from the United States. ​

​

So you know......
There are other discussions in the forum about sound issues with at least one of these cards. Some of the time, sound issues with 3k cards turns out to be system issues.

Anyway, there is a STICKY thread set up for the purpose of reporting any issues with the cards. Totem team members do read it, work on fixes and notify us of said fixes. One of the reasons it's been set up like that is to avoid having threads scattered all over the forum about the same thing.


Forum > Bugs & Fixes > Please Fix these Cards http://www.virtuagirl.com/forumPost.php?&foId=4&ftId=19359

www.virtuagirl.com/forumPost.php?&foId=4&ftId=19359

With all due respect, a "domestic subsidiary" in the United States is still OWNED by the company that created it. In this case, Totem...which is in France...which is in Europe...which is where you can't buy anything from if the purchase originates in the United States using a "gift card". Totem won't be selling the new Las Vegas cards shot in Las Vegas FROM Las Vegas. You'll still be buying them from Totem, Europe.

No, I'm not "Tolstoy". Or a "highly acclaimed, international corporate lawyer". I don't even know what you MEAN by that. Lawyers don't "make laws". Governments do (at least in the U.S.). Lawyers might specialize in something like "International Corporate Law", but they can't PRACTICE in anyplace they aren't legally licensed to PRACTICE their law degree. Even if Totem has "international coporate lawyers", all those lawyes could DO is tell Totem something like, "Well, the U.S. laws prohibit somebody in the U.S. from using a gift card to purchase your product. Isn't anything you can do to change that." I guess if that makes them a "Tolstoy" that's somebody's opinion...which also isn't law.

Just trying to explain to some folks here why their expectations of Totem or their third-party billers are totally unrealistic.

Will it cost Totem lost revenue in sales because of the new laws? Only from U.S. customers who have totally unrealistic expectations from Totem. Or are too lazy to do what they may need to do to continue purchasing the product. Or are too scared that "somebody" might find out they ARE buying the product if they don't use an "anonymous" method to do it.

And as Wyldanimal also said, I am not representing Totem in any "official capacity" with my posts either. So if you want to get pissed off at me, that's fine. I won't lose any sleep over it. But don't get pissed off at Totem. They can't solve the problem of not being able to use "gift cards" from the U.S. anymore to buy their product...unless the current laws change. But I wouldn't hold my breath expecting anybody..lawyer or not...trying to "legally sue" the U.S. government to change the law. Do you honestly think that some "highly acclaimed, international corporate lawyers" in the U.S. representing U.S. companies wouln't have tried to prevent the law because it would cost the U.S. companies income? That is already happening too. Are you gonna buy any more Visa, Mastercard, etc "gift cards" to puchase tokens from Totem? Those U.S. companies just lost all the revenue from those "gift card" purchases you won't be making anymore. And NONE of the arguments from those companies or their lawyers prevented the law from being enacted. And it doesn't look like any of them are trying to sue the government over it. So if THEY couldn't prevent it or get it changed, what on Earth makes you think Totem or Epoch or THEIR lawyers can?

Now having said all that, if you are asking Totem to create a "subsidiary" in the U.S. that TOTALLY falls under U.S. corporate laws, and sells ALL of it's U.S. produced products FROM the U.S., that's a different question. Probably won't happen though, because the cost for Totem to do that would far outweigh any revenues they will lose if you quit buying their product from Europe anymore. All transactions for ALL of their cards, even the ones not filmed in the U.S., would have to be able to be purchased by you FROM their U.S. corporation if you wanted to buy the cards filmed in France using a "gift card", or you STILL wouldn't be able to purchase the cards filmed (sold) in/from France. I'm guessing Totem isn't going to want to spend that kind of money just because you can't use an "anonymous gift card" to buy their product from France anymore.

My opinion, more shows full nudity walking with high heels and in/out full nude will be very appreciated.
My most favourite shows from the past are those, especially the fully nude walking in high heels
The entry of eufrat in the db card c0019-64502 is one of the best examples in that sense

Wow. I had no idea that it was utterly impossible for Totem to incorporate a domestic subsidiary in the United States - thereby creating a "United States product."

I'm sure, however, that some of the highly acclaimed, international corporate lawyers on this site can duly advise Totem, regarding same.

The point of my original post was to make Totem aware that there was NOW a problem with buying credits with debit cards, in the United States. This just might result in a financial loss for Totem - something that Totem just might be interested in.

I had assumed that the posting of my thoughts on same were my prerogative.​

Totem renders a wonderful product, which I have very much enjoyed.

The point of my original post was that I hoped to continue enjoying same, and that something might be worked out by Totem.

For those who wish to play Tolstoy concerning this matter, especially the highly acclaimed, international corporate lawyers on this site, write on.

​​​​​

FalconAF - 4 hour(s) ago
...
You may want Totem to "set up a third-party company in the U.S. (like CCBill U.S, instead of the current CCBill EU)
...
CCBill U.S. may not be able to make that transaction for you EITHER, because it would be a "work around" for money laundering to take place to countries outside the U.S. CCBill U.S. would be using pre-paid debit or gift cards then (yours) to ***** the laws in place.

Exactly !!!!

The Final Product is Outside the USA. Does not Matter if the Biller is Here in the USA or in EU.
They CAN NOT process your USA GIFT card to purchase outside the USA.

I've Already Provided at least Two CASH to Card options.
What More Do you Not Understand?

The Law is the Law. It Can't be Changed.

Get a PO box.
Order a dang international Prepaid Card.
Got to Wallmart or CVS and USE CASH to put money on the Card.

Problem Solved!

Spouse Doesn't know...
Paper Trail Leads back to your PO box, Not Your Home.

This is How it works.. Deal with it.

PS This Me Posting as Me, Not as a MOD, not as anything Official from Totem
You are All Mature Adults, and as such, you should take time to learn the changes to the law.


any type of card that you DO NOT have to PUT in your NAME is a "GIFT" card.

Only a card that is Under YOUR NAME can be used for purchase outside the USA.
The CARD Must be Registered to you.

also, sorry I am not yelling. used caps for emphases.

Have just added some new Fracedelic Scenes. They are in a zip file located at

scenes.virtuastripper.net/No.6_Fracedelic_Scenes_03.zip

The new scenes include two new scenes (20 and 21) added to the original Fracedelic scenes list. There are also a couple of new abstract shaders scenes (14 and 15) added to the Abstract Shaders scenes list. There is also a new category "Psychedelic Shaders" which is similar to the abstract shaders but uses shaders that are more colourful and possibly simpler than some of the abstract ones.

I have added some additional images to the "fractal" and "fractal round" folders, including some of @Lunarpup's wonderful creations. These will work with the older fracedelic scenes (if you have them) as well as the new ones.

I have also added some more images for the Complex Function Psychedelic scenes. There are no new scenes for these but the additional images will work with existing scenes.

With the images the zip file is around 115MB.

Please note that the all the scenes in this zip file will work if installed to the their own folder but will work much better if installed into the same folder as the previous Fracedelic Scenes that I have issued. This gives a greater selection of images, etc. Please note that if installing with the previous Fracedelic scenes you may get some nags about duplicate files. Tell Windows to overwrite the files - this makes sure you have the latest version of the files.

Feel free to use any of the scenes for whatever you wish to.

Hello
Congratulations for your work so far.
Sound problems; Desk Babes:Cards 0043 Viola & Merry Pie, 0051 Lucy Li in 3K.😢
Can you fix it please.
Thanks

If you want to see a great pole routine, play Kiara Lord's Insatiable card 0121 clip e0121_2052041. Play it at slow speed with a slow dancing to jazz song playing.

Also take a look at Ava Courcelles Executive Assistant clips e014_6148204 and e014_6148401. Once again play at slow speed with a slow dancing jazz song playing.

Belle Claire in Upper Management doesn't use a pole, but her standup striptease routines like e0228_14336406 and e0228_22528407 are great at slow speed with slow dancing jazz playing.

These are great examples of what I would like to see from VirtuaGirl. Of course these are good looking women who have great interaction with you.

@Falcon: Buddy, you are absolutely correct in all you just said :)

I'd like to see more teasing, more dancing and stripping. Yes, I think the girls are getting in fact naked too quick. And there are too many clips where the girls are naked right from the start.

Just to be sure, I wasn't just focusing on "The Government" in my post. People in this thread are ***** about companies like Totem, Epoch, and any other third-party billing intermediary and saying things like, "They should change it!" No...they shouldn't. Because they CAN'T. They can't do anything that will allow someone to use "debit cards" the way you used to (overseas purchases from the U.S. specifically). These companies have to abide by the laws that are in place. You may want Totem to "set up a third-party company in the U.S. (like CCBill U.S, instead of the current CCBill EU) so you can use your prepid debit card to buy tokens. CCBill U.S. may not be able to make that transaction for you EITHER, because it would be a "work around" for money laundering to take place to countries outside the U.S. CCBill U.S. would be using pre-paid debit or gift cards then (yours) to ***** the laws in place. They would be the equivalent of the offshore money intermediaries "hiding" your (possible) money laundering transaction, and they aren't gonna be stupid enough to agree to put themselves in that situation.

The real "problem" is the purchaser's lack of access or willingness to use purchasing methods other than debit cards now. If you can't use a pre-paid debit card anymore, and are ***** to use a credt card or alternative payment method...for WHATEVER reason you may have...that is NOT anybody's problem except your own. "Waiting for Totem" to respond back to you with a "solution" that will make you happy is silly. There are numerous other methods available already for Totem as a company to do a financial transaction with you. Just because you may not like those other methods is not Totem's problem, nor should they have to appease anybody about any laws being changed.

Limiting your financial exposure is a smart safety precaution. But let's get real. There is a BIG difference between making a "secure online transaction" with a company like Totem vs going to "Pinky's Porn Emporium" in the Ukraine or a Third World country and giving them your credit or debit card info. CCBill and Epoch and the other payment options Totem uses have been around for a long time and are secure (barring any evidence to the contrary), so using any payment method that will leave a "paper trail" with them isn't the real issue. The SECURITY they provide you is DEPENDANT on them being able to IDENTIFY you are the real owner of the debit or credit card. They CAN'T do that if you try to use an "anonymous pre-paid debit or gift card". THAT is what the new laws are trying to prevent...the use of "anonymous" financial transactions to prevent "money laundering". They, like Totem, can't change the debit card laws. Neither can VISA, Mastercard, or American Express. But people here seem to expect them to.

When your credit or debit card gets "hacked" and you experience an "Identity Theft", it's usually because you gave your info to a site that was dishonest to begin with. Or your OWN computer wasn't secure enough, and a "hacker" got the info because your OWN computer was subject to compromise during the transaction.

It's a good thing to try and "limit your financial exposure" when makig Internet financial transactions. But you can also get paranoid about it too. Unless you are making ALL of your personal financial transactions with cash, you are exposed.

All I am saying is get your reasoning in line with you complaint issue about this whole topic. You can't use a pre-paid debit card with VG anymore? It's not Totem's or any of their third-party billing companies problem to solve THAT for you. They ALREADY have other viable payment options you can use.

You don't want to use any of those other viable payment options because you are trying to "hide" the fact you are buying Adult Content? That's YOUR problem to solve. Not Totem's. Not Epoch's. Not any third-party billing company VG uses.

If you have a "Significant Other" or an Employer that you could get into trouble with if they found out you were a "porn dog", that's YOUR problem. Don't insist Totem or anybody else provide you with a "secure method" to buy their product so you won't get "caught" doing it.

I'm pretty sad that in many forum threads there are endless repeat discussions about content (costume) disparities. I can't help feeling that if Totem was a company like Pixar, certain outfits would be specifically chroma-keyed and we would have a choice of options for outfits for any scene. Goodness sakes, we can't even get a wet skin filter for our models from the Team..(goodluck @HSS) Totem needs to do more post production R & D. Perhaps one trial clip with virtual clothes would be a useful way to approach this.

Yeah, I don't care about the whole government "paper trail" issue. When I stated earlier that I use prepaid because they don't leave a paper trail, I meant that I use them so my wife doesn't see my purchase in our banking account. If I was single, you'd bet that I owned every card available through direct purchase from bank 😛​ ! So, I guess in that case I misused the phrase "paper trail."

She knows I purchase them; she even brings them out on the desktop and flips through until one comes up with an outfit she likes. But that doesn't mean she's fine with me using our shared bank account to make these purchases- that's what my personal money that I recieve, like gifts (usually in the form of Visa gift cards) is for, including all of my other hobbies.

There's really no use in arguing over anything; we're just trying to give a suggestion to Totem that would result in immediate and continued purchases. As far as I know, we haven't heard one way or the other regarding the matter other than currently it is not possible to use these prepaid gift cards. We don't know whether to drop the subject or if it being discussed at all behind the scenes. Either way, the issue has been stated and a suggestion has been made and it's up to them from that point on.

I just feel it's important to let Totem know what is and is not worth it to me; obviously they're the judge a​​​​nd will do what's in the best interest of their business. They do give us a number of payment options, but adding this one guarantees sales, be it from someone like me who only uses gift cards due to ease, or someone who is worried about security and just needs that piece of mind. We're all customers to some extent, and I always feel like the more options the better! 😉

I totally agree with Jununger on this. Let the girls be creative and give them the time they need to find the right mood and provide more creative/stylish outfits. Plus it's about the variation of the different shows/cards of one girl so we can see the different aspects of her character/performance.

FalconAF you are not wrong . But it seems that you are only latching on to a single aspect of this. As some members have already stated; by using a pre-paid card you are limiting your financial exposure to those same online (if you will forgive the term "hackers") by purchaseing a pre-paid card with cash. You yourself have already stated that there is no such thing as internet security.

"Blaming Totem for any of it is ludicrous. They didn't change the laws." - absolutely right!

Of course if the south had won this would have never happened! -- LOL 😎

@Rex It's great that Totem tries to fulfill wishes and I'm okay with guys who like naked feet. But me I really don't need naked feet in a strip show. The thing is...the demo clips are telling me nothing about the show all they do is they give me a short impression of the outfit. The first two clips are identical standing clips. That's fine but it's a fact that the girl can wear the shoes in all three demo clips but when I watch the whole show it's possible that there are only three or four clips with shoes in the entire show and the rest is with naked feet! I'm a huge fan of high heels and boots and stockings. I am disappointed each time I buy a card with a good outfit just to see that the girl is taking the shoes off in almost every clip, even in the pole clips. Sometimes the pole clips are even beginning without shoes. I think there should be cards with shoes and there should be those without. For example I agree with The3LeggedMan on this: Swimsuit and workout outfits can be with naked feet, but others such as those with high heels and lingerie should be filmed completely in shoes. And Poledancing clips without shoes is really a no-go, sry.

Naked feet should be situational. Certain clips like taskbar clips or swing clips make more sense to show naked feet. But it should be mandatory to have heels on when the girl is pole dancing. I am a big fan of the way high heels make a woman's legs flex and appear curvier. Also it depends on the outfit, swimsuit/workout outfits look weird with heels on, so I wouldn't mind if those cards are 100% naked feet.

LOST IN TRANSLATION

When staff members don't speak English as their native language, sometimes there can be misunderstandings.

I am somewhere between "Get naked too quick" and "It's just about right". I voted "Get naked too quick" but don't want to go overboard with it either though. I love seductive cloths like see-through stuff and the like!

I went with 'Get naked too quick' as the site is about girls stripping on your desktop and that means teasing in various stages of undress for me. Nearly all the girls on here feature on some porn sites so it's not like seeing them naked is anything new.

I think outfits, hair and make up are the most important especially if the girl has heaps of cards. You did awesome with the (Lucy Li) Lara Croft themed outfit and more creative clothes like that would be very nice.

I also agree with some of the other members, I like when the girl does something other than just stripping and feel more props are needed. Abigaile's 'Afternoon Snack' is an often viewed card for me, from lying down on her stomach reading to covering herself in her ice cream it is a great show. Sabrisse is in a similar outfit in card 1603 where she writes in her book and asks if she should remove her Skirt ot Panties, she's very interactive in the show and it's heaps of fun.

On the other end you have the cards from Sapphira. She is super sexy and I have bought most of her cards but her shows are all the same, she needs more direction and props. Clover is the same, she has very set routine and her shows are too repetitive. You did way too many Viola cards in a short space of time for me but at least with her 'Midnight Run' card you added a sexy gym outift with some skipping which was really cool.

The quality of 3K is amazing and the models are top shelf, for me it's up to the team to get more creative with the card ideas and outfits. And I know this not the topic of the poll and it's been said many times before but more diversity is a must.

Cheers.

Sometime, the girl could do a litlle more teasing before stripping, but it's ok.
For me, virtuagirl was about teasing, and stripping of beautiful girl.
Deskbabe was a more hardcore VG version, with explicit action, and much faster nude clip.
I think that, the main problem i see right now...isn't that the girl strip too fast.
(even if i like stripping and would love more of it sometime)
It's more like...the girls often don't wear much, i see it all.
There is no teasing, she's already nearly naked before beginning the show.
So, not much to strip, or tease.
When wearing very small bikini, maybe they should also wear...beach robe, at the beginning of the show.
When wearing dentelle, stocking, why not wearing other cloth, and reveal all that?
That would make more stripping action, and slowly revealing, teasing.
This would allow much more teasing, and stripping.
Wearing more clothes, even if it's nearly transparent, make them more desirable at the beginning of the show.
We can imagine...the parts she will reveal to ourself later on, slowly.
Virtuagirl was...about stripping.
I think it's more about naked girl now.
Maybe it's time...to return a little more...in the past.

Mitsouko is quick off the mark...

You must love this @Rex ,. Like throwing bird seed you get so much good input from community on topics :) I am a farm boy raised in the city. I love naked feet,. Creatively work them in. Outfits and themes are factors as others have said. I voted not every show. Unless it's an Army theme no trench foot please. Even that someone may like to see,. Not me,. Clean your feet on the way in.

I am really quite indifferent to naked feet.

However, I much prefer the feet to be covered by stockings/tights and/or shoes. I also like the girls to keep their shoes and stockings on. It is not that I dislike naked feet, but I just prefer to see them 'decorated' with shoes or fabric.

Personally, I do not get anything out of watching girls taking of shoes/socks or watching girls massage their *****. It is not something that offends or disgusts me. I just find it boring. But I understand some like this, so it should be included to some extent. In saying that, if the girl is wearing a skirt and is 'accidentally' flashing her panties while taking her shoes off, that would be one of my favourite clips. So I can see me enjoying theses clips in some cases, but not because of the feet. So if the girl is showing something else while taking off her shoes, Totem can ***** two birds with one stone.

I don't mind naked feet, but I don't want VGHD to become some sort of foot-fetish site, where feet become the focus in every single clip. That would become irritating, and for me, frankly boring. On the other hand, I believe the site should cater for all tastes to some extent. After all, I would wish the site to cater for my principle interests as a panty lover, so it's only fair that feet loves should be catered for.

Of course, there may be some costumes where having naked feet is completely appropriate, such as bikini, lingerie and some casual wear clips. In these cases, I don't mind seeing feet in every clip.

By the way, I want to thank @Rex for engaging in the community in this way. I think it is good that you get are asking us and let's us feel that you care what your customers think.

I think I would leave that more up to the girls. Whats more important is that's difference in balance cloths on/tease/nude from card to card and girl to girl. Thanks!

A difficult pole to vote on.

Personlly, I buy VGHD because the girls are clothed. For me, the naked clips are an optional bonus. I like to see the girl naked eventually because I want to see what she is like under the costume. But the truth is, I would not ***** too much much if a girl didn't show her pussy at all.

My favoutite clips are where a fully clothed girl is flashing her panties, where a girl is frolicking around in panties (topless or otherwise), or where the girl is flashing her pussy from her panties These are the core clips for me, the ones I am really paying for. The rest are just a bonus.

There are three clips that annoy me the most.
1) Clips where a girl is fully clothed and doesn't do anything interesting.
2) Girl starts clip fully clothed only to take the clothing off immediately
3) The girl starts off naked.

When I watch VGHD, I usually set it to topless and light sexy, because I am more interested in the clothed clips.

For me there should be a certain number of clips where the girl is fully clothed. In the end, I buy the cards principally for the costume. So I want to see it. However, the girl should still do tease actions like flash her panties, bra, etc, without showing a nipple or pussy. On the other hand, I don't want to go back to the days of the earlier cards where a girl could have several fully clothed clips where she just stands or sits about without even flashing anything. That is just frustrating.

For me, there should be at least one clip of each type for the following:
1) At least one clip of each type where the girl is fully clothed. But this should still include teasing including upskirts and panty flash. In effect there is no stripping.
2) At least one clip of each type where the girl transitions from fully clothed to partly clothed or topless.
3) At least one clip from each type where the girl transitions from partly or fully clothed to naked. This could also include things like upskirts without panty.
4) A couple of 'holistic' clips where the girl starts of fully clothed and strips to naked.
5) A couple of clips where the girl starts our naked or almost naked.

This may seem a bit formulaic, but I have no problem with that. Nearly all art produced for commercial consumption is formulaic. The artistic talent in VGHD should be able to make each feel fresh, new and unique. Also, the formula above is based on the girl wearing outer wear. It may have to be altered slightly where the model starts in a bikini or lingerie.

Anyway, that is my view. Many will disagree. But I think it will give something for everyone.

It's going to be one of those divisive issues, if you include more shoes or clothes you'll have those who want less of each up in arms... the girls know what they feel comfortable stripping out of, it's a good reason to keep it as it is. However, the team have never been afraid to try something new, I trust them to make the right decision...

Oh for cryin' out loud! This whole thread is crazy. Paper trails? Anonymity? How long have you been using the Internet and buying things on it?

I worked in IT Security for 20 years...yes...for "The Government". If you think you are anonymous on the Internet, you are seriously deluding yourself. A 13-year old can download free programs from the Internet that could hack your computer, do information searches about you on the Internet, and write a novel about your life history.

Money Laundering a world-wide issue today. "Anonymous" money transfers...yes, even with debit cards...are a major source of it, just like any OTHER "anonymous" money transaction from a phony bank account, whatever. The laws have changed. You are gonna have to get over it.

Blaming Totem for any of it is ludicrous. They didn't change the laws.

What I'm REALLY seeing here are people who want to pay for and download Adult Content Material from the Internet, but they don't want anybody (or somebody specific...wife, fiance', girlfriend, whatever) to KNOW they are doing it. That's a personal problem, not a Totem problem.

Besides, even if you manage to hide it from a "significant other", that in NO WAY means that OTHER people, organizations, institutions, or (insert your most loved Conspiracy Theory here) wouldn't be able to "know" about it if they really wanted to.

You gonna buy "porn" on the Internet? I'll find a 13-year old with a computer who can tell me when, where, and how much you paid for it.

The new laws weren't enacted to prevent you from hiding your "porn" purchases from your wife or employer. There's a hell of a lot more important reason they were enacted. Really now..."The Government" could care LESS if you are a "porn dog" or not. If they REALLY were trying to CATCH you doing that, they'd have to incarcerate over 50% of the population already. Are you in jail yet?

Paper Trails? You leave one every time you do ANYTHING on the Internet. Just the fact that you GO to an adult site leaves a "paper trail". You aren't hiding from ANYBODY who would really want to know. Ask how easy it is for a divorce lawyer to "find out" your Internet habits if they want to when they are representing your wife in a divorce case. There are private investigators who make a GREAT living providing that info to them.

It wouldn't matter if you paid for your VG model cards with sticks and stones using NO money transactions. It wouldn't take a rocket scientist to figure out from your Internet "paper trail" when you downloaded them to YOUR computer who "bought" them.

Welcome to the real world.

I think the fact that many models recently are only wearing lingerie adds to the feeling of "overstripping". If there's only so much she can take off before she's naked, ou cna't help it.

I.e, my suggestion would be to get more layers of costumes. Lingerie shows are O.K, but they shouldn't form 50% of the video base like now.

Definitely getting naked too quick. Keep the outfits and the heels on, with the outfit off and the heels still on by the end of the show.

I ***** naked feet. ***** ***** *****. I want high heels 100% of the time, especially pumps. If I know a card has naked feet, I will not buy it. No exceptions. Also, I dislike the constant bait and switch with cards that don't have naked feet in the description yet over 95% of the card has naked feet. It's a waste of my credits. Same for cards that have 'naked feet' that actually keep the heels on. The descriptions need to be more accurate. If it weren't for some comments on the cards that say the heels stay on, I wouldn't get the card because it says naked feet. If the descriptions were accurate and there were 100% heel cards, I would spend more credits.

More sensual clips would be better. With too much nudity, it feels like deskbabe without the masterbation. Some clips should be nude while majority should be teasing, taking things off little at a time. Some dancing wouldn't ***** either.

I think most clips should end with nudity. Having said that, I'm not a fan of cards that have too many clips where the girl starts naked. A few sure, but the whole point of these (hopefully) sexy outfits is... anticipation. This is also true for me for deskbabes cards. I can barely tell Tracy Smile's deskbabes cards apart because she spends so little time "in costume."